<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miami Dolphins current salary cap roster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salarycap.net/2008/02/11/miami-dolphins-current-salary-cap-roster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salarycap.net/2008/02/11/miami-dolphins-current-salary-cap-roster/</link>
	<description>Sports and the money it generates for salary caps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:26:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Football &#187; Miami Dolphins current salary cap roster</title>
		<link>http://www.salarycap.net/2008/02/11/miami-dolphins-current-salary-cap-roster/comment-page-1/#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Football &#187; Miami Dolphins current salary cap roster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salarycap.net/2008/02/11/miami-dolphins-current-salary-cap-roster/#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>[...] A fellow blogger wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Miami Dolphins current salary cap roster&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractSalary cap thinks the perfect place to start is with the Miami Dolphins. Bill Parcells has taken over the operations to see what he can do with a 1-15 team. Lets face it, this is as bad as &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A fellow blogger wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Miami Dolphins current salary cap roster&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractSalary cap thinks the perfect place to start is with the Miami Dolphins. Bill Parcells has taken over the operations to see what he can do with a 1-15 team. Lets face it, this is as bad as &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
